![Nirvana nevermind cover picture](https://knopkazmeya.com/8.png)
#Nirvana nevermind cover picture series
Says the lawsuit: “Weddle took a series of sexually graphic nude photographs of Spencer. “Two months later,” the article said, “Geffen Records sent 1-year-old Spencer Elden a platinum album and a teddy bear.” The NPR story went on to say that the family didn’t think more about it until, three months later, they saw a 9′-by-9′ blow-up of the cover on the Tower Records wall on Sunset Blvd. “I was like, ‘What’s up?’ And he’s like, ‘Well, I’m shooting kids all this week, why don’t you meet me at the Rose Bowl (Aquatic Center), throw your kid in the drink?’ And we just had a big party at the pool, and no one had any idea what was going on!” His friend Weddle, the photographer, “calls us up and was like, ‘Hey Rick, wanna make 200 bucks and throw your kid in the drink?,'” the father recalled. In 2008, Spencer’s father, Rick, recounted the 1991 shoot to NPR.
![nirvana nevermind cover picture nirvana nevermind cover picture](http://www.feelnumb.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/kurt_cobain_in_utero_back_cover_collage_frances-734x1024.jpg)
![nirvana nevermind cover picture nirvana nevermind cover picture](https://cdn.shoplightspeed.com/shops/634895/files/22940667/1600x2048x2/nirvana-nevermind-magnet.jpg)
It’s cool but weird to be part of something so important that I don’t even remember.” It’s strange that I did this for five minutes when I was 4 months old and it became this really iconic image. In 2016, the last time Spencer recreated the pose as an adult, he told the New York Post, “The anniversary means something to me. The filing references some famous, or infamous, moments in rock album art history: “The concept and creation of this image replicated previous controversial campaigns used to promote music with sexually explicit material depicting a child or outright child pornography, including the album covers for Scorpion’s ‘Virgin Killer,’ Blind Faith’s ‘Blind Faith’ and Van Halen’s ‘Balance.'” “Neither Spencer nor his legal guardians ever signed a release authorizing the use of any images of Spencer or of his likeness, and certainly not of commercial child pornography depicting him,” reads the suit. A possibly new contention in the lawsuit is that Elden’s parents never even signed paperwork allowing any use of the image. In previous interviews, he’s said he tried to get in touch with Grohl and Novoselic, on a friendly basis, but never got a reply. What was a constant, in the past as now, is that Elden has said he was never compensated for the photo beyond the $200 his parents were paid for it on the day of the shoot.
![nirvana nevermind cover picture nirvana nevermind cover picture](https://i0.wp.com/pbs.twimg.com/media/EJWai6ZWwAAM6Hc.jpg)
Until now, despite his ongoing ambivalence about the photo’s legacy, he hadn’t described it as pornographic. However, in most of the interviews accompanying these photo shoots, he expressed deeply mixed feelings about being famous for the “Nevermind” cover and whether he was exploited by it. The cover art subject - who, like the “Nevermind” album itself, is now 30 - is asking at least $150,000 from each of the defendants, who include include surviving band members Dave Grohl and Krist Novoselic Courtney Love, the executor of Kurt Cobain’s estate Guy Oseary and Heather Parry, managers of Cobain’s estate photographer Kirk Weddle art director Robert Fisher and a number of existing or defunct record companies that released or distributed the album in the last three decades.Ĭuriously, original Nirvana drummer Chad Channing is also named as a defendant who was part of the group at the time, even though he had been replaced by Grohl in 1990, before the album was recorded or the cover photography shot.Įlden has repeatedly recreated the pose as a teenager and adult, diving into pools to pose (with swim trunks on) on the occasion of the album’s 10th, 17th, 20th and 25th anniversaries. “Defendants used child pornography depicting Spencer as an essential element of a record promotion scheme commonly utilized in the music industry to get attention, wherein album covers posed children in a sexually provocative manner to gain notoriety, drive sales, and garner media attention, and critical reviews.” District Court’s central district of California and obtained by Variety. “Defendants intentionally commercially marketed Spencer’s child pornography and leveraged the shocking nature of his image to promote themselves and their music at his expense,” reads the lawsuit, filed in the U.S.
![Nirvana nevermind cover picture](https://knopkazmeya.com/8.png)